Skip navigation
Top navigation skipped
San Saba County
2020 Confidence Interval Detail
San Saba County
206-902/Richland Springs ISD
Category Summary
| (1) Category |
(1) Local Value |
(1) Stratum Ratio |
(1) State Value |
(2) Sample Size |
(3) Total Parcels |
Stratum Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1,810,640 | 0.7522 | 2,407,126 | 9 | 65 | 0.060972469 |
| A | 1,856,480 | 0.9698 | 1,914,292 | 8 | 35 | 0.026743753 |
| A | 1,771,770 | 1.0923 | 1,622,054 | 7 | 22 | 0.010096611 |
| A | 1,806,720 | 1.1251 | 1,605,831 | 6 | 15 | 0.006676939 |
| E | 53,015,890 | 0.8526 | 62,181,433 | 20 | 561 | 0.047588936 |
| Random Totals: | 60,261,500 | 69,730,736 | 50 | 698 | ||
| CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: | 17,038,830 | 19,650,114 | ||||
| CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: | 4,786,820 | 5,406,656 | ||||
| Total Test Values | 82,087,150 | 94,787,506 |
Margin of Error
| Margin of Error Percent: | 6.3334719 |
|---|---|
| Margin of Error Value: | 6,003,340 |
Confidence Interval Values(5)
| Local Test Value: | 82,087,150 | OUTSIDE CONFIDENCE INTERVAL |
|---|---|---|
| State Lower Limit: | 88,784,166 | (State Test Value minus Margin of Error Percent) |
| State Upper Limit: | 100,790,846 | (State Test Value plus Margin of Error Percent) |
Sources:
(1) See Stratified Category Worksheet Reports PTS236, PTS430
(2) Number of parcels sampled by staff
(3) Total Category Parcels from Stratification Report, Appraisal Roll, or Self-report
(4) Includes any parcels in A, B, C, D2, E, F1, G1, G2, or L1 marked as exception properties
(5) Unstudied categories and sub-categories were not included in the Confidence Interval Values