Top navigation skipped
San Saba County
2024 Confidence Interval Detail
San Saba County
206-902/Richland Springs ISD
Category Summary
| (1) Category |
(1) Stratum Number |
(1) Local Value |
(1) Stratum Ratio |
(1) State Value |
(2) Sample Size |
(3) Total Parcels |
Stratum Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | 3,267,550 | 1.0798 | 3,026,070 | 9 | 58 | 0.020667934 |
| A | 3 | 3,356,760 | 0.9211 | 3,644,295 | 9 | 33 | 0.140166146 |
| A | 4 | 4,014,960 | 0.9953 | 4,033,919 | 7 | 26 | 0.054139312 |
| A | 5 | 4,261,120 | 1.1017 | 3,867,768 | 6 | 18 | 0.010473078 |
| E | 0 | 119,979,430 | 1.0181 | 117,846,410 | 17 | 606 | 0.011894723 |
| Random Totals: | 134,879,820 | 132,418,462 | 48 | 741 | |||
| CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: | 17,918,460 | 18,388,710 | |||||
| CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: | 3,225,210 | 3,343,781 | |||||
| Total Test Values | 156,023,490 | 154,150,953 |
Margin of Error
| Margin of Error Percent: | 5.0000000 |
|---|---|
| Margin of Error Value: | 7,707,548 |
Confidence Interval Values(5)
| Local Test Value: | 156,023,490 | WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL |
|---|---|---|
| State Lower Limit: | 146,443,405 | (State Test Value minus Margin of Error Percent) |
| State Upper Limit: | 161,858,501 | (State Test Value plus Margin of Error Percent) |
Sources:
(1) See Stratified Category Worksheet Reports PTS236, PTS430
(2) Number of parcels sampled by staff
(3) Total Category Parcels from Stratification Report, Appraisal Roll, or Self-report
(4) Includes any parcels in A, B, C, D2, E, F1, G1, G2, or L1 marked as exception properties
(5) Unstudied categories and sub-categories were not included in the Confidence Interval Values