purchasing

Historically Underutilized Business (HUB) Program

The State of Texas Disparity Study – 2009

Related Cases

Supreme Court

  • City of Richmond v. J.A Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469 (1989).
  • Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (1995).

Other Federal Courts

  • W. State Paving Co. v. Washington DOT, US Dot and FHWA, 407F.3d 983 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 2006 WL 386392 (U.S. Feb 21, 2006).
  • Gross Seed Company v. Nebraska Department of Roads, Civil Action File No. 4:00CV3073 (D. Neb. May 6, 2002), aff’d 345 F, 3d 964 (8th Cir. 2003).
  • Sherbrook Turf, Inc. v. Minnesota Depart of Transportation, and Gross Seed Co. v. Nebraska Department of Road 345 F. 3d 964 (8th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 124 S. Ct. 2158 (2004).
  • Monterey Mech. V. Wilson, 125 F.3d 702 (9th Cir. 1997)
  • Coral Constr. Co. v. King County, 941 F.2d 910 (9th Cir. 1991)
  • Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Coalition for Econ. Equality, 950 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1991).
  • Concrete Works of Colo., Inc. v. City and County of Denver, 321 F.3d 950 (10th Cir. 2003) cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1027, S. Ct. 556 (2003)
  • Builder’s Ass’n of Greater Chicago v. County of Cook, Chicago, 256F. 3d 642 (7th Cir. 2001).
  • W.H. Scott Constr. Co. V. City of Jackson, 199 F.3d 2006 (5th Cir. 199).
  • Northern Contracting, Inc. v. Illinois, 473 F.3d 715 (7th Cir. 2007).
  • Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater, 228 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000) (Cert. granted then dismissed as improvidently granted) Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta, 532 U.S. 941, 534 U.S. 103 (2001).
  • Houston Constrs. Ass’n v. Metro Transit Auth., 189 F. 3d 467 (5th Cir. 1999).
    Decision:
  • Klaver Constr., Inc. v, Kansas DOT, 211 F. Supp. 2d 1296 (D. Kan. 2002).
  • Jana-Rock Constr., Inc. v. New York State Dept of Economic Development, 438 F.3d195 (2d Cir. 2006).
  • In Re City of Memphis, W. Tenn. Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors Zellner Constr. Co., Inc. v, City of Memphis, 293 F.3d 345 (6th Cir. 2002).
  • Eng’g Contractors Ass’n of South Florida, Inc. v. Meto. Dade County, 122 F.3d 859 (11th Cir. 1997).
  • Contractors Ass’s of E. Philadelphia. v. City of Philadelphia, 91 F.3d 586 (3d Cir. 1996).
  • Rapid Test Prods., Inc. v. Durham Sch. Servs., Inc., No. 05-4066, 2006 WL 2382430 (7th Cir. Aug. 18, 2006)