Top navigation skipped
San Saba County
2021 Confidence Interval Detail
San Saba County
206-902/Richland Springs ISD
Category Summary
| (1) Category |
(1) Local Value |
(1) Stratum Ratio |
(1) State Value |
(2) Sample Size |
(3) Total Parcels |
Stratum Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 1,614,820 | 0.7408 | 2,179,833 | 9 | 57 | 0.052186037 |
| A | 1,390,880 | 0.8964 | 1,551,629 | 8 | 26 | 0.139899966 |
| A | 2,689,790 | 0.9124 | 2,948,038 | 7 | 35 | 0.131557347 |
| A | 4,092,020 | 0.9370 | 4,367,150 | 6 | 30 | 0.041016526 |
| E | 72,359,180 | 0.9311 | 77,713,651 | 19 | 589 | 0.244921443 |
| Random Totals: | 82,146,690 | 88,760,301 | 49 | 737 | ||
| CATG D1 EXCEPTION VALUES: | 18,937,523 | 19,076,596 | ||||
| CATG J EXCEPTION VALUES: | 2,860,730 | 3,258,397 | ||||
| Total Test Values | 103,944,943 | 111,095,294 |
Margin of Error
| Margin of Error Percent: | 15.7733577 |
|---|---|
| Margin of Error Value: | 17,523,458 |
Confidence Interval Values(5)
| Local Test Value: | 103,944,943 | WITHIN CONFIDENCE INTERVAL |
|---|---|---|
| State Lower Limit: | 93,571,836 | (State Test Value minus Margin of Error Percent) |
| State Upper Limit: | 128,618,752 | (State Test Value plus Margin of Error Percent) |
Sources:
(1) See Stratified Category Worksheet Reports PTS236, PTS430
(2) Number of parcels sampled by staff
(3) Total Category Parcels from Stratification Report, Appraisal Roll, or Self-report
(4) Includes any parcels in A, B, C, D2, E, F1, G1, G2, or L1 marked as exception properties
(5) Unstudied categories and sub-categories were not included in the Confidence Interval Values